Diseño y validación de un instrumento de medición de la carga académica de estudiantes de carreras de la salud
Author
dc.contributor.author
Harden Díaz, Natalia del Carmen
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pino León, Constanza
Author
dc.contributor.author
Orrego Molina, Shenda Paz
Author
dc.contributor.author
Flores Alvarado, Sandra Andrea
Author
dc.contributor.author
Esturillo Pinet, Javiera
Author
dc.contributor.author
Flores Castro, Valentina Paz
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rubio Calero, Gabriela Patricia
Author
dc.contributor.author
Aguiar Arias, Bárbara Victoria
Author
dc.contributor.author
Peralta Camposano, José Rafael
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2022-05-03T16:37:16Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2022-05-03T16:37:16Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Rev Med Chile 2021; 149: 873-880
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0034-9887
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/185228
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
A high academic workload may have adverse consequences
among university students. Aim: To design and validate an instrument to
measure both real and perceived academic workload for health care students.
Material and Methods: The questionnaire was designed based on a bibliographic
revision and the conduction of two focus groups conformed by undergraduate
students from a Faculty of Medicine. Afterwards, it was submitted to qualitative
pre-tests. The final instrument consists of a self-applied questionnaire with both
a characterization section (10 questions) and one concerning academic workload
by subject and semester (five and two questions, respectively). A national and
international panel of 14 experts evaluated the survey content’s validity. The
analysis was performed according to the Content Validity Ratio and the Content
Validity Index. Results: The complete instrument was validated with an 84%
consensus between the judges. Each section of the instrument was approved separately
with a 77% and a 94% agreement, respectively. After being individually
analyzed by the judges, each question was validated. The wording of questions
was improved taking the experts comments into consideration. Conclusions: The
proposed instrument constitutes a contribution for the measurement of real and
perceived academic workload for students.
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
es
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Soc. Médica Santiago
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States