Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAcuña Avila, Mirta
Authordc.contributor.authorBenadof Fuentes, Dona
Authordc.contributor.authorYohannessen Vásquez, Karla
Authordc.contributor.authorLeiva, Yennybeth
Authordc.contributor.authorClement Campillo, Pascale
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-06-03T19:08:55Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-06-03T19:08:55Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2022
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPediatrics (2022) 22:182es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1186/s12887-022-03241-1
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/185839
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: Central nervous system (CNS) infection has been an ongoing concern in paediatrics. The FilmArray (R) Meningoencephalitis (FAME) panel has greater sensitivity in identifying the aetiology of CNS infections. This study's objective was to compare the aetiological identification and hospitalization costs among patients with suspected CNS infection before and after the use of FAME. Methods: An analytical observational study was carried out using a retrospective cohort for the pre-intervention (pre-FAME use) period and a prospective cohort for the post-intervention (post-FAME use) period in children with suspected CNS infection. Results: A total of 409 CSF samples were analysed, 297 pre-intervention and 112 post-intervention. In the pre-intervention period, a total of 85.5% of patients required hospitalization, and in the post-intervention period 92.7% required hospitalization (p < 0.05). Median of ICU days was significantly lower in the post-intervention period than it was in the pre-intervention period. The overall positivity was 9.4 and 26.8%, respectively (p< 0.001). At ages 6 months and below, we found an increase in overall positivity from 2.6 to 28.1%, along with an increased detection of viral agents, S. agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, and N. meningitidis. The use of this diagnostic technology saved between $2916 and $12,240 USD in the cost of ICU bed-days. FAME use provided the opportunity for more accurate aetiological diagnosis of the infections and thus the provision of adequate appropriate treatment. Conclusions: The cost/benefit ratio between FAME cost and ICU bed-day cost savings is favourable. Implementation of FAME in Chilean public hospitals saves public resources and improves the accuracy of aetiological diagnosis.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipBiomerieuxes_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherBMCes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourcePediatricses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDiagnostic stewardshipes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCNS infectionses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFilmArray (R)es_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectChildrenes_ES
Títulodc.titleFilmArray® Meningoencephalitis panel in the diagnosis of central nervous system infections: stewardship and cost analysis in a paediatric hospital in Chilees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States