Exactitud de tamizaje de retinopatía diabética: inteligencia artificial versus tecnólogos médicos entrenados
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ibáñez Bruron, María Carolina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cruzat Corssen, Andrea
Author
dc.contributor.author
Órdenes Cavieres, Gonzalo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Coria, Marcelo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2022-12-26T20:00:05Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2022-12-26T20:00:05Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Rev Med Chile 2021; 149: 493-500
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0034-9887
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/190032
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: The early detection of retinopathy among diabetics is of utmost
importance. Aim: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of two diabetic retinopathy
(DR) screening strategies currently used in the Chilean public health system.
Material and Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of 371 diabetic patients
aged 61 ± 14 years (61% women) who underwent DR screening at a public
Hospital between July 1 and August 31, 2019. The mydriatic retinal photographs
of all participants were classified using artificial intelligence software (DART) and
trained medical technologists, independently. The precision of both strategies was
compared with the reference standard, namely the evaluation of the fundus by
an ophthalmologist with a slit lamp. Participants with severe non-proliferative
DR or worse were considered as positive cases. The ophthalmologist was blind to
the results of the screening tests. Results: Twenty four percent of participants had
DR, including 34 (9.2%) who had sight threatening DR in at least one eye. The
sensitivity and specificity of DART were 100% (95% confidence intervals (CI):
90-100%) and 55,4% (95% CI: 50-61%), respectively. Medical technologists
had a sensitivity of 97,1% (95% CI: 85-100%) and a specificity of 91,7% (95%
CI: 88-94%). The only case missed by medical technologists was a patient with
unilateral panphotocoagulated DR. Conclusions: Both strategies had a similar
sensitivity to detect cases of sight-threatening DR. However, the specificity of
DART was significantly lower compared to medical technologists, which would
greatly increase the burden on the health system, a very important aspect to
consider in a screening strategy.
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
es
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Sociedad Médica de Santiago
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States