Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorTolo, Astrid
Authordc.contributor.authorLillejord, Sølvi
Authordc.contributor.authorFlórez Petour, María Teresa
Authordc.contributor.authorHopfenbeck, Therese N.
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-12-27T13:59:39Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-12-27T13:59:39Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Educational Change (2020) 21:59–82
Identifierdc.identifier.issn15731812
Identifierdc.identifier.issn13892843
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1007/s10833-019-09359-x
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/190612
Abstractdc.description.abstractIn response to accountability systems dominated by external inspections and achievement data, calls are being made for intelligent accountability or a new accountability paradigm that focuses on meaningful learning, enabled by professionally skilled and committed educators within the system. In such systems, the actors are encouraged to strive for continuous development in learning organisations based on teamwork, distributed leadership, and professional learning communities. School leaders are positioned between district level administrators and teachers in such processes and have the responsibility to secure professional development. Using the implementation of the national program ‘Assessment for Learning’ in Norway as a case, the article shows that leaders approach professional development diferently. Analyses of interviews with leaders from 7 schools reveal three distinct approaches related to how school leaders perceive knowledge. Some school leaders assume that teachers have the necessary knowledge and skills and trust them to manage the implementation process without leader support. Other school leaders distrust teachers’ knowledge and skills and assume that the proper knowledge exists outside the school. These leaders seek external support when they meet teacher resistance. In a third approach, school leaders assume that knowledge develops through collaboration and thereby engage with teachers in continuous judgment about the implementation procedure. In the discussion, questions of trust and distrust are analysed in relation to how professional knowledge is developed and how professional discretion can support the development of intelligent accountability in schools.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherSpringer
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Educational Change
Keywordsdc.subjectIntelligent accountability
Keywordsdc.subjectAssessment for learning
Keywordsdc.subjectImplementation
Keywordsdc.subjectTeacher–leader-relation
Keywordsdc.subjectSchool leaders
Keywordsdc.subjectProfessional development
Títulodc.titleIntelligent accountability in schools: a study of how school leaders work with the implementation of assessment for learning
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCIELO
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile