Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCottin Arredondo, Marianne
Authordc.contributor.authorBlum, Kathrin
Authordc.contributor.authorKonjufca, Jon
Authordc.contributor.authorQuevedo Labbé, Iván Yamil
Authordc.contributor.authorKaaya, Sylvia
Authordc.contributor.authorBehn, Alex
Authordc.contributor.authorSchmeck, Klaus
Authordc.contributor.authorSharp, Carla
Authordc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Ronan
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T17:32:46Z
Available datedc.date.available2023-09-28T17:32:46Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2022
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry (2022) 22:379es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1186/s12888-022-04023-w
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/195873
Abstractdc.description.abstractQuestion Most adolescents live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and about 10% of them face mental problems. The mental health provision gap in low- and middle-income countries could be addressed by evidence-based practices, however costs are implementational barriers. Digitalization can improve the accessibility of these tools and constitutes a chance for LMIC to use them more easily at a low cost. We reviewed free and brief evidence-based mental health assessment tools available for digital use to assess psychopathology across different domains in youth. Methods For the current study, instruments from a recent review on paper-based instruments were re-used. Additionally, a systematic search was conducted to add instruments for the personality disorder domain. We searched and classified the copyright and license terms available from the internet in terms of free usage and deliverability in a digital format. In the case that this information was insufficient, we contacted the authors. Results In total, we evaluated 109 instruments. Of these instruments, 53 were free and digitally usable covering 11 mental health domains. However, retrieving information on copyright and license terms was very difficult. Conclusions Free and digitally adaptable instruments are available, supporting the strategy of using instruments digitally to increase access. The instrument's authors support this initiative, however, the lack of copyright information and the difficulties in contacting the authors and licence holders are barriers to using this strategy in LMIC. A comprehensive, online instrument repository for clinical practice would be an appropriate next step to make the instruments more accessible and reduce implementation barriers.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherBMCes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceBMC Psychiatryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDigitalizationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEvidence-based assessmentes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLow-income contextses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMental healthchildrenes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAdolescentses_ES
Títulodc.titleDigital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?es_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States