Where Is the ‘Problem’ in Design Studio: Purpose and Significance of the Design Task
Author
dc.contributor.author
Maturana Cossio, Beatriz
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-01-08T02:54:48Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-01-08T02:54:48Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014-11
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
ArchNet International Journal or Architectural Research. 8(3): 32-44, November 2014
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
1994-6961
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/118189
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Design studio is characterised by a teaching model that is distinctly suited for problem-solving. Correspondingly, literature, including information produced by Australian faculties of architecture about their courses asserts that design studio is modelled around problem-solving. However, my research into design studio handouts found a common omission in posing a ‘problem’—a problem that would justify a design solution and from which the ´significance´ of the task would derive. I argue that a well-articulated design problem imbues the case with purpose and significance. It also provides a benchmark against which the results can be assessed and verified.