Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorLópez Morales, Ernesto
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T15:38:31Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-08-13T15:38:31Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationDialogues in Human Geography 2018, Vol. 8(1) 47–50es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1177/2043820617752005
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150928
Abstractdc.description.abstractPhillips and Smith's attempt to refresh (rural) gentrification theory is successful as they provide a prolific set of epistemological comparative threads and substantiate this position via analysis of the UK, France and the US cases. Nevertheless, in my opinion, academia should go beyond the Western European/North American comfort zone and embrace theoretical and epistemological complexity, the currently extended and variegated planetary space presents.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFondecyt 1151287 COES project Fondap 15130009es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSagees_ES
Sourcedc.sourceDialogues in Human Geographyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGlobal Southes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPlanetary urbanizationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRuth Glasses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectUrbanes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRural dividees_ES
Títulodc.titleA rural gentrification theory debate for the global south?es_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrgfes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record