Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMartín, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorVildósola, P. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBersezio Miranda, Cristian 
Authordc.contributor.authorHerrera, A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBortolatto, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSaad, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorOliveira, Osmir 
Authordc.contributor.authorFernández Godoy, Eduardo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:24:48Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:24:48Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, Volumen 43, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 965-972.
Identifierdc.identifier.issn03005712
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.011
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159114
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective The aim of this clinical randomized double-blind split-mouth study was to assess the effectiveness of a 6% hydrogen peroxide with nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide light activated bleaching agent. Method 31 patients were treated with: one upper hemiarcade with a 35% hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent and the other hemiarcade with a 6% hydrogen peroxide. Two applications were completed each treatment session and three sessions were appointed, with one week interval between them. Tooth colour was registered each session and 1 week and 1 months after completing the treatment by spectrophotometer, registering parameters L∗, a∗and b∗, and subjectively using VITA Classic guide. Tooth sensitivity was registered by VAS and patient satisfaction and self-perception result was determined using OHIP-14. Tooth colour variation and sensitivity were compared between both bleaching agents. Results Both treatment showed a change between baseline colour and all check-points with a ΔE = 5.57 for 6% and of ΔE = 7.98 for the 35% one month after completing the (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were seen when subjective evaluations were compared. Also, no differences were seen in tooth sensitivity between bleaching agents. OHIP-14 questionnaire demonstrated a significant change for all patients after bleaching. Conclusions A 6% hydrogen peroxide with nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide light activated agent is effective for tooth bleaching, reaching a ΔE of 5.57 one month after completing the treatment, with no clinical differences to a 35% agent neither in colour change or in tooth sensitivity. Clinical significance A low concentration hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent may reach good clinical results with less adverse effects.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherElsevier Ltd
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Dentistry
Keywordsdc.subjectBleaching teeth
Keywordsdc.subjectClinical randomized trial
Keywordsdc.subjectEffectiveness
Keywordsdc.subjectLow concentration
Keywordsdc.subjectOHIP-14
Keywordsdc.subjectTitanium dioxide
Títulodc.titleEffectiveness of 6% hydrogen peroxide concentration for tooth bleaching - A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile