A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: X How to avoid being misled by clinical studies' results in dentistry
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carrasco Labra, Alonso
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brignardello Petersen, Romina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Azarpazhooh, Amir
Author
dc.contributor.author
Glick, Michael
Author
dc.contributor.author
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-12-20T15:24:50Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-12-20T15:24:50Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of the American Dental Association, Volumen 146, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 919-924.
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00028177
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.adaj.2015.08.008
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159125
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background and Overview Clinicians using evidence to inform decisions on a daily basis have access to a number of tools to help them judge the importance of discriminating studies conducted using suboptimal methods from more rigorous ones. Many checklists have been developed to facilitate and guide clinicians to identify and critically appraise clinical studies. However, only limited guidance is available addressing how clinicians can identify misleading claims from those that can be supported reliably by study results. Practical Implications In this final article of a series of 10, the authors provide key concepts that clinicians can use to help them avoid using biased inferences or statements that are "too good to be true."