Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAravena, Pedro 
Authordc.contributor.authorDelgado, Felipe 
Authordc.contributor.authorOlave, Hugo 
Authordc.contributor.authorUlloa Marín, Carolina 
Authordc.contributor.authorPérez-Rojas, Francisco 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:24:50Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:24:50Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPatient Preference and Adherence, Volumen 10, 2016, Pages 1719–1725.
Identifierdc.identifier.issn1177889X
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.2147/PPA.S106814
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159129
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: To describe the perception of the quality of life in oral health based on the Health-Related Quality of Life instrument in its Spanish version (HRQOL-sp) in Chilean patients with third molar extraction surgery. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study. The HRQOL-sp was administered to dental patients at the Public Hospital in Rio Bueno in southern Chile treated for unilateral third molar extraction between March and June 2014. The instrument was applied by phone survey on the first, third, fifth, and seventh days after surgery. For the ordinal scale, the response was considered interference in the quality of life when patients selected the options “quite a bit of trouble” or “lots of trouble” for oral function and general activity; and selected complications-related signs and symptoms, a pain level score with a Verbal Rating Scale (range 0 to 7), and worst pain perceived. The patient’s sociodemographic data, type of surgery, and the quality of life level were analyzed according to the domains of the HRQOL-sp instrument. Results: A total of 106 patients were selected (age: 20.4±7.39 years; 71.7% women) and a total of 127 extracted third molars. On the first day of follow-up, most patients reported interference in their quality of life. The main problems were difficulty opening the mouth (50.94%) and swelling (83.02%). The worst symptom perceived was “bad breath” (.31%) and the worst pain felt was a mean of 4.31±1.62 on the Verbal Rating Scale. All items gradually reduced until the seventh day. Conclusion: The HRQOL-sp revealed substantial interference in the quality of life on the first postoperative day. It is suggested that the risk factors associated with quality of life be analyzed and the instrument in Spanish be validated.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherDove Medical Press Ltd.
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourcePatient Preference and Adherence
Keywordsdc.subjectComplications
Keywordsdc.subjectDentistry
Keywordsdc.subjectExtraction
Keywordsdc.subjectOral surgery
Keywordsdc.subjectQuality of life
Keywordsdc.subjectThird molar
Títulodc.titleChilean patients’ perception of oral health-related quality of life after third molar surgery
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile