Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBenleulmi, Salah S.
Authordc.contributor.authorMatysiak, Julien
Authordc.contributor.authorHenríquez, Rodrigo R.
Authordc.contributor.authorVaillant, Cédric
Authordc.contributor.authorLesbats, Paul
Authordc.contributor.authorCalmels, Christina
Authordc.contributor.authorNaughtin, Monica
Authordc.contributor.authorLeón, Oscar
Authordc.contributor.authorSkalka, Anna Marie
Authordc.contributor.authorRuff, Marc
Authordc.contributor.authorLavigne, Marc
Authordc.contributor.authorAndreola, Marie Line
Authordc.contributor.authorParissi, Vincent
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-03-15T16:08:57Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-03-15T16:08:57Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRetrovirology (2015) 12:13
Identifierdc.identifier.issn17424690
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1186/s12977-015-0145-9
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166382
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: Retroviral integration depends on the interaction between intasomes, host chromatin and cellular targeting cofactors as LEDGF/p75 or BET proteins. Previous studies indicated that the retroviral integrase, by itself, may play a role in the local integration site selection within nucleosomal target DNA. We focused our study on this local association by analyzing the intrinsic properties of various retroviral intasomes to functionally accommodate different chromatin structures in the lack of other cofactors. Results: Using in vitro conditions allowing the efficient catalysis of full site integration without these cofactors, we show that distinct retroviral integrases are not equally affected by chromatin compactness. Indeed, while PFV and MLV integration reactions are favored into dense and stable nucleosomes, HIV-1 and ASV concerted integration reactions are preferred into poorly dense chromatin regions of our nucleosomal acceptor templates. Predicted nucleosome occupancy around integration sites identified in infected cells suggests the presence of a nucleosome at the MLV and HIV-1 integration sites surrounded by differently dense chromatin. Further analyses of the relationships between the in vitro integration site selectivity and the structure of the inserted DNA indicate that structural constraints within intasomes could account for their ability to accommodate nucleosomal DNA and could dictate their capability to bind nucleosomes functionally in these specific chromatin contexts. Conclusions: Thus, both intasome architecture and compactness of the chromatin surrounding the targeted nucleosome appear important determinants of the retroviral integration site selectivity. This supports a mechanism involving a global targeting of the intasomes toward suitable chromatin regions followed by a local integration site selection modulated by the intrinsic structural constraints of the intasomes governing the target DNA bending and dictating their sensitivity toward suitable specific nucleosomal structures and density.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherBioMed Central
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceRetrovirology
Keywordsdc.subjectChromatin
Keywordsdc.subjectIntasomes
Keywordsdc.subjectNucleosomes
Keywordsdc.subjectRetroviral integration selectivity
Títulodc.titleIntasome architecture and chromatin density modulate retroviral integration into nucleosome
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile