Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorRial Crestelo, M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMorales Rosello, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorHernández Andrade, E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPrefumo, F. 
Authordc.contributor.authorOros, D. 
Authordc.contributor.authorCaffici, D. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSotiriadis, A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorZohav, E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorCruz Martínez, R. 
Authordc.contributor.authorParra Cordero, M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLubusky, M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorKacerovsky, M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorFigueras, F. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2020-08-17T21:07:47Z
Available datedc.date.available2020-08-17T21:07:47Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationUltrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1002/uog.20370
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/176456
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjectives To determine the quality of Doppler images of the fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery (UA) using an objective scale, and to determine the reliability of this scale, within a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Revealed versus concealed criteria for placental insufficiency in unselected obstetric population in late pregnancy (Ratio37)). Methods The Ratio37 trial is an ongoing randomized, open-label, multicenter controlled study of women with a low-risk pregnancy recruited at 20 weeks. Doppler measurements of the fetal MCA and UA were performed at 37 weeks. Twenty patients from each of the six participating centers were selected randomly, with two images evaluated per patient (one each for the MCA and UA). The quality of a total of 240 images was evaluated by six experts, scored on an objective scale of six items. Inter- and intrarater reliability was assessed using the Fleiss-modified kappa statistic for ordinal scales. Results On average, 89.2% of MCA images and 85.0% of UA images were rated as being of perfect (score of 6) or almost perfect (score of 5) quality. Kappa values for intrarater reliability of quality assessment were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93) for the MCA and UA, respectively. The corresponding inter-rater reliability values were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.89) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.89), respectively. Conclusion The quality of MCA and UA Doppler ultrasound images can be evaluated reliably using an objective scale. Over 85% of images, which were obtained by operators from a broad range of clinical practices within a multicenter study, were rated as being of perfect or almost perfect quality. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of quality assessment was very good.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecologyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDoppleres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMiddle cerebral arteryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectQuality controles_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRandomized multicenter triales_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectReliabilityes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectUmbilical arteryes_ES
Títulodc.titleQuality assessment of fetal middle cerebral and umbilical artery Doppler images using an objective scale within an international randomized controlled triales_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile