Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMorales Chvets, Alicia Alvarovna
Authordc.contributor.authorContador Cotroneo, Rafael Ignacio
Authordc.contributor.authorBravo, Joel
Authordc.contributor.authorCarvajal Pavez, Paola Lorena
Authordc.contributor.authorSilva, Nora
Authordc.contributor.authorStrauss Avendaño, Franz Josef
Authordc.contributor.authorGamonal Aravena, Jorge Antonio
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-12-06T14:19:42Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-12-06T14:19:42Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health (2021) 21:12es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1186/s12903-020-01276-3
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/183060
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this triple-blind placebo-controlled parallel-arm randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 or azithromycin as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with stage III periodontitis. Methods: Forty-seven systemically healthy participants with stage III periodontitis were recruited. Following SRP, the participants were randomly assigned to one of three treatment modalities; (1) placebo (n = 15), (2) probiotics (n = 16) and (3) antibiotics-azithromycin (n = 16). The participants were monitored at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after therapy. Probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and plaque accumulation (PI) were evaluated. Results: All 47 participants completed the study. At 12 months, all groups showed significant improvements of PPD and PI (p < 0.012) irrespective of the treatment modality and without significant differences between the groups. Probiotics and azithromycin showed no added benefit in terms of CAL. While the placebo (p = 0.002) and the antibioticazithromycin (p = 0.002) group showed a significant reduction of BOP, only the placebo group revealed a significant reduction of CAL at 12 months follow-up (p = 0.003). The number of sites and teeth with PPD ≥ 5, ≥ 6 and ≥ 7 mm were significantly reduced in all groups at 12 months follow-up (p < 0.025) irrespective of the treatment regime and without significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: The use of probiotics or azithromycin as an adjunct to SRP failed to provide additional benefits in the treatment of stage III periodontitis. The benefits of these two treatment regimes as an adjunct to SRP remain unclear.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technologic Investigation Resource, Santiago, Chile (Fondecyt Project) 1130570 CONICYT-PCHA/Magister Nacional/2013-22130172 Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherBMCes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceBMC Oral Healthes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPeriodontitises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectScaling and root planinges_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLactobacillus rhamnosuses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAzithromycines_ES
Títulodc.titleClinical effects of probiotic or azithromycin as an adjunct to scaling and root planning in the treatment of stage III periodontitis: a pilot randomized controlled clinical triales_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States