Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorJonker, Brend P.
Authordc.contributor.authorStrauss Avendaño, Franz Josef
Authordc.contributor.authorNaenni, Nadja
Authordc.contributor.authorJung, Ronald E.
Authordc.contributor.authorWolvius, Eppo B.
Authordc.contributor.authorPijpe, Justin
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T18:32:20Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-12-07T18:32:20Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationClin Oral Impl Res. 2021;32:1041–1051.es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1111/clr.13796
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/183109
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjectives: To test whether early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) results in different esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with early implant placement without ARP. Material and methods: Seventy-five patients requiring single tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla were recruited. Following tooth extraction, the patients were randomly allocated to three groups: (a) ARP using demineralized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM-C) covered by a collagen matrix (CM) (n = 25), (b) ARP using DBBM-C covered with a palatal graft (PG) (n = 25) and (c) spontaneous healing (control) (n = 25). Eight weeks after tooth extraction, a CBCT was taken and early implant placement was performed in all patients. Esthetic, clinical and PROMs were evaluated one year post-loading. Results: A total of 70 patients were available for re-examination at one year post-loading. The median mid-facial mucosal margin change amounted to −0.02 mm (IQR −0.27–0.46) in the CM group, −0.13 mm (IQR −0.44–0.25) in the PG group and −0.14 mm (IQR −0.29–0.07) in the control group, with no significant differences between the groups. Mean PES scores amounted to 7.0 ± 1.4 in the CM group, 7.1 ± 1.5 in the PG group and 7.3 ± 1.7 in the control group without significant differences between the groups. Plaque, bleeding on probing and probing depth did not differ between treatment groups. PROMs in general revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Early implant placement with ARP using either a collagen matrix or a palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement without ARP. When a failing tooth can be replaced with an implant within 2 months after tooth extraction, the added value of ARP might be clinically negligible.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipStraumann AG Geistlich Pharma AGes_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherWileyes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceClinical Oral Implants Researches_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAlveolar ridge preservationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectClinical triales_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEarly implant placementes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPatient-centered outcomeses_ES
Títulodc.titleEarly implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures: One-year results of a randomized clinical triales_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States