Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAnderson, Benjamin M.
Authordc.contributor.authorQasim, Muhammad
Authordc.contributor.authorCorrea, Gonzalo
Authordc.contributor.authorEvison, Felicity
Authordc.contributor.authorGallier, Suzy
Authordc.contributor.authorFerro, Charles J.
Authordc.contributor.authorJackson, Thomas A.
Authordc.contributor.authorSharif, Adnan
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T12:47:36Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-11-24T12:47:36Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2022
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationClinical Kidney Journal, 2022, vol. 15, no. 1, 145 152es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1093/ckj/sfab137
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/189348
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground. Frailty is associated with poor outcomes for haemodialysis patients, but its prevalence is uncertain due to heterogeneous definitions. The aim of this study was to compare and contrast prevalence and features of commonly used frailty instruments in a British haemodialysis cohort. Methods. The FITNESS (Frailty Intervention Trial iN End-Stage patientS on haemodialysis) study recruited adults aged 18 years after informed consent, with 3 months haemodialysis exposure and no hospital admission within 4 weeks unless for dialysis access. Study participants were clinically phenotyped with frailty instruments including the Frailty Index (FI), Frailty Phenotype (FP), Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), alongside comprehensive baseline data collection of biochemical, clinical and social characteristics. Results. Between 12 January 2018 and 18 April 2019, 485 haemodialysis patients were recruited. Baseline demographics were median age 63 years, male sex 58.6% and non-White ethnicity 42.1%. Prevalence of frailty was high; 41.9% of participants were frail by FP, 63.3% by FI, 50.2% by EFS and 53.8% by CFS. Female gender was associated with increased frailty, with no independent association observed with age or ethnicity. While correlation between frailty instruments was strong, intraclass correlation coefficient for frailty agreement was 0.628 (95% confidence interval 0.585–0.669) and only weak agreement between instrument pairs.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipQueen Elizabeth Hospital Charity 17-3-886es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherOxfordes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceClinical Kidney Journales_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAgees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEpidemiologyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectESRDes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHaemodialysises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPhysical activityes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectQuality of lifees_ES
Títulodc.titleCorrelations, agreement and utility of frailty instruments in prevalent haemodialysis patients: baseline cohort data from the FITNESS studyes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States