Now showing items 1-10 of 10

    • Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 

      Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Santesso, Nancy; Neumann, Ignacio; Mustafa, Reem; Mbuagbaw, Lawrence; Etxeandia Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; De Stio, Catherine; McCullagh, Lauren; Alonso Coello, Pablo; Meerpohl, Joerg; Vandvik, Per Olav; Brozek, Jan; Akl, Elie; Bossuyt, Patrick; Churchill, Rachel; Glenton, Claire; Rosenbaum, Sarah; Tugwell, Peter; Welch, Vivian; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Schuenemann, Holger (BIOMED CENTRAL, 2015)
      Background: Systematic reviews represent one of the most important tools for knowledge translation but users often struggle with understanding and interpreting their results. GRADE Summary-of-Findings tables have been ...
    • Decision-Making about healthcare related tests and diagnostic strategies:user testing of GRADE evidence tables 

      Mustafa, Reem; Wiercioch, Wojtek; Santesso, Nancy; Cheung, Adrienne; Prediger, Bárbara; Baldeh, Tejan; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Neumann, Ignacio; Bossuyt, Patrick; Garg, A.; Lelgemann, Monika; Bühler, Diedrich; Brozek, Jan; Schünemann, Holger (PLOS One, 2015)
      Objective:To develop guidance on what information to include and how to present it in tables summarizing the evidence from systematic reviews of test accuracy following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development ...
    • Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations 

      Neumann, Ignacio; Alonso Coello, Pablo; Vandvik, Per; Agoritsas, Thomas; Mas, Gemma; Akl, Elie; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Emparanza, José; McCullagh, Lauren; De Sitio, Catherine; McGinn, Thomas; Almodaimegh, Hind; Almodaimegh, Khalid; Rivera, Solange; Rojas, Luis; Stirnemann, Jérôme; Irani, Jihad; Hlais, Sani; Mustafa, Reem; Bdair, Fadi; Aly, Abdelrahman; Kristiansen, Annette; Izcovich, Ariel; Ramírez Morera, Anggie; Brozek, Jan; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Schünemann, Holger (Elsevier, 2018-07)
      Objectives: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations to assist clinicians in decision-making and to reduce the gap between best current research evidence and clinical practice. However, some argue ...
    • The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses 

      Mustafa, Reem A.; Santesso, Nancy; Brozek, Jan; Akl, Elie A.; Walter, Stephen D.; Norman, Geoff; Kulasegaram, Mahan; Christensen, Robin; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Falck Ytter, Yngve; Chang, Stephanie; Hassan Murad, Mohammad; Vist, Gunn E.; Lasserson, Toby; Gartlehner, Gerald; Shukla, Vijay; Sun, Xin; Whittington, Craig; Post, Piet N.; Lang, Eddy; Thaler, Kylie; Kunnamo, Ilkka; Alenius, Heidi; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Alba, Ana C.; Nevis, Immaculate F.; Gentles, Stephen; Ethier, Marie Chantal; Carrasco Labra, Raúl; Khatib, Rasha; Nesrallah, Gihad; Kroft, Jamie; Selk, Amanda; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Schünemann, Holger J. (Elsevier, 2013)
      Objective: We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing the quality of evidence (QoE) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Study Design and Setting: ...
    • GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 

      Schünemann, Holger J.; Wiercioch, Wojtek; Brozek, Jan; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Mustafa, Reem A.; Manja, Veena; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Neumann, Ignacio; Falavigna, Maicon; Alhazzani, Waleed; Santesso, Nancy; Zhang, Yuan; Meerpohl, Jörg J.; Morgan, Rebecc (Elsevier USA, 2017)
      © 2016 The Author(s) Background Guideline developers can: (1) adopt existing recommendations from others; (2) adapt existing recommendations to their own context; or (3) create recommendations de novo. Monetary and nonmonetary ...
    • Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format 

      Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Santesso, Nancy; Neumann, Ignacio; Mustafa, Reem; Mbuagbaw, Lawrence; Etxeandia Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; De Stio, Catherine; McCullagh, Lauren; Alonso Coello, Pablo; Meerpohl, Joerg; Vandvik, Per; Brozek, Jan; Akl, Elie; Bossuyt, Patrick; Churchill, Rachel; Glenton, Claire; Rosenbaum, Sarah; Tugwell, Peter; Welch, Vivian; Garner, Paul; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Sch€unemann, Holger (Elsevier, 2016)
      Objectives: The current format of summary of findings (SoFs) tables for presenting effect estimates and associated quality of evidence improve understanding and assist users finding key information in systematic reviews. ...
    • Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed 

      Langendam, Miranda; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Santesso, Nancy; Mustafa, Reem; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Ventresca, Matthew; Heus, Pauline; Lasserson, Toby; Moustgaard, Rasmus; Brozek, Jan; Schunemann, Holger (Elsevier, 2016)
      Objectives: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group has developed GRADE evidence profiles (EP) and summary of findings (SoF) tables to present evidence summaries in ...
    • Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments 

      Santesso, Nancy; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Langendam, Miranda; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Mustafa, Reem; Heus, Pauline; Lasserson, Toby; Opiyo, Newton; Kunnamo, Ilkka; Sinclair, David; Garner, Paul; Treweek, Shaun; Tovey, David; Akl, Elie; Tugwell, Peter; Brozek, Jan; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Schunemann, Holger (Elsevier, 2016)
      Background: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is widely used and reliable and accurate for assessing the certainty in the body of health evidence. The GRADE working group has ...
    • The GRADE evidence to decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels 

      Neumann, Ignacio; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Wiercioch, Wojtek; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Cuello, Carlos; Akl, Elie A.; Mustafa, Reem A.; Al-Hazzani, Waleed; Etxeandia Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Rojas, Maria Ximena; Falavigna, Maicon; Santesso, Nancy; Brozek, Jan; Iorio, Alfonso; Alonso Coello, Pablo; Schunemann, Holger J. (BIOMED Central, 2016)
      Background: Judgments underlying guideline recommendations are seldom recorded and presented in a systematic fashion. The GRADE Evidence-to-Decision Framework (EtD) offers a transparent way to record and report guideline ...
    • The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: A report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels 

      Neumann, Ignacio; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Wiercioch, Wojtek; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Cuello, Carlos; Akl, Elie A; Mustafa, Reem A.; Al-Hazzani, Waleed; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Rojas, Maria Ximena; Falavigna, Maicon; Santesso, Nancy; Brozek, Jan; Iorio, Alf (BioMed Central Ltd., 2016)
      © 2016 Neumann et al. Background: Judgments underlying guideline recommendations are seldom recorded and presented in a systematic fashion. The GRADE Evidence-to-Decision Framework (EtD) offers a transparent way to record ...