Now showing items 1-2 of 2

    • Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey 

      Akl, Elie A.; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Neumann, Ignacio; Johnston, Bradley C.; Sun, Xin; Briel, Matthias; Busse, Jason W.; Ebrahim, Shanil; Granados, Carlos E.; Iorio, Alfonso; Irfan, Affan; Martínez García, Laura; Mustafa, Reem A.; Ramírez Morera, Anggie; Selva, Anna; Solà, Iván; Sanabria, Andrea Juliana; Tikkinen, Kari A. O.; Vandvik, Per O.; Vernooij, Robin W. M.; Zazueta, Oscar E.; Zhou, Qi; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Alonso Coello, Pablo (BMJ, 2015)
      Objectives: To describe how systematic reviewers are reporting missing data for dichotomous outcomes, handling them in the analysis and assessing the risk of associated bias. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane ...
    • Strategies to assess the validity of recommendations: a study protocol 

      Martínez García, Laura; Sanabria, Andrea Juliana; Araya Cabello, Ignacio; Lawson, Jennifer; Haynes, R. Brian; Rigau, David; Solà, Iván; Díaz del Campo, Patra; Estrada, Maria Dolors; Etxeandia Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; García Álvarez, Elvira; Gracia, Javier; Kotzeva, Anna; Louro González, Arturo; Salcedo Fernandez, Flavia; Trujillo Martín, María Mar; Alonso Coello, Pablo (BioMed Central, 2013)
      Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) become quickly outdated and require a periodic reassessment of evidence research to maintain their validity. However, there is little research about this topic. Our project ...