Now showing items 1-2 of 2

    • Mustafa, Reem A.; Santesso, Nancy; Brozek, Jan; Akl, Elie A.; Walter, Stephen D.; Norman, Geoff; Kulasegaram, Mahan; Christensen, Robin; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Falck Ytter, Yngve; Chang, Stephanie; Hassan Murad, Mohammad; Vist, Gunn E.; Lasserson, Toby; Gartlehner, Gerald; Shukla, Vijay; Sun, Xin; Whittington, Craig; Post, Piet N.; Lang, Eddy; Thaler, Kylie; Kunnamo, Ilkka; Alenius, Heidi; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Alba, Ana C.; Nevis, Immaculate F.; Gentles, Stephen; Ethier, Marie Chantal; Carrasco Labra, Raúl; Khatib, Rasha; Nesrallah, Gihad; Kroft, Jamie; Selk, Amanda; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Schünemann, Holger J. (Elsevier, 2013)
      Objective: We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing the quality of evidence (QoE) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Study Design and Setting: ...
    • Johnston, Bradley C.; Ebrahim, Shanil; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Furukawa, Toshi A.; Patrick, Donald L.; Crawford, Mark W.; Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.; Schunemann, Holger J.; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Nesrallah, Gihad (BMJ Publishing Group, 2015)
      Introduction Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often the outcomes of greatest importance to patients. The minimally important difference (MID) provides a measure of the smallest change in the PRO that patients perceive ...