Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMaturana Cossio, Beatriz 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-01-08T02:54:48Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-01-08T02:54:48Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2014-11
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationArchNet International Journal or Architectural Research. 8(3): 32-44, November 2014en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.issn1994-6961
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/118189
Abstractdc.description.abstractDesign studio is characterised by a teaching model that is distinctly suited for problem-solving. Correspondingly, literature, including information produced by Australian faculties of architecture about their courses asserts that design studio is modelled around problem-solving. However, my research into design studio handouts found a common omission in posing a ‘problem’—a problem that would justify a design solution and from which the ´significance´ of the task would derive. I argue that a well-articulated design problem imbues the case with purpose and significance. It also provides a benchmark against which the results can be assessed and verified.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjecteducación y arquitecturaen_US
Títulodc.titleWhere Is the ‘Problem’ in Design Studio: Purpose and Significance of the Design Tasken_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Chile