Ecological drivers of group living in two populations of the communally rearing rodent, Octodon degus
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2012Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Ebensperger, Luis A.
Cómo citar
Ecological drivers of group living in two populations of the communally rearing rodent, Octodon degus
Author
Abstract
Intraspecific variation in sociality is thought to
reflect a trade-off between current fitness benefits and costs
that emerge from individuals' decision to join or leave
groups. Since those benefits and costs may be influenced
by ecological conditions, ecological variation remains a
major, ultimate cause of intraspecific variation in sociality.
Intraspecific comparisons of mammalian sociality across
populations facing different environmental conditions have
not provided a consistent relationship between ecological
variation and group-living. Thus, we studied two populations
of the communally rearing rodent Octodon degus to
determine how co-variation between sociality and ecology
supports alternative ecological causes of group living. In
particular, we examined how variables linked to predation
risk, thermal conditions, burrowing costs, and food availability
predicted temporal and population variation in
sociality. Our study revealed population and temporal
variation in total group size and group composition that
covaried with population and yearly differences in ecology.
In particular, predation risk and burrowing costs are
supported as drivers of this social variation in degus.
Thermal differences, food quantity and quality were not
significant predictors of social group size. In contrast to
between populations, social variation within populations
was largely uncoupled from ecological differences.
Patrocinador
Funding
was provided by FONDECYT grant #1060499 to LAE by National
Science Foundation grants #0553910 and #0853719 and Louisiana
Board of Regents Research and Development grant (LEQSF 2007-09-
RD-A-39) to LDH and by the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity
(grants ICM-P05-002, and PBF-23-CONICYT-Chile) to RAV. Other
funding sources were the Program 1 of Centro de Estudios Avanzados
en Ecología and Biodiversidad (FONDAP 1501–001), the American
Society of Mammalogists, and Sigma Xi. RS was funded by a
scholarship from CONICYT (Chilean Government). This study was
approved by the ULM Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee
and adhered to U.S. and Chilean laws (permit 1-58/2005 [2711] by the
Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile.
Quote Item
Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2012) 66:261–274
Collections