Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorPizarro Urzúa, Nancy A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGünther Sapunar, Germán es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorNúñez Vergara, Luis es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2008-08-20T13:01:33Z
Available datedc.date.available2008-08-20T13:01:33Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2007-06-10
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY A-CHEMISTRY 189(1):23-29en
Identifierdc.identifier.issn1010-6030
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/120471
Abstractdc.description.abstractA different photophysical and photochemical behavior has been found between two second generation antihypertensive 1,4-dihydropyitidines (1,4-DHPs), felodipine and nimodipine. While nimodipine was observed as being more reactive and photolabile in excited state, felodipine showed a major reactivity in its ground state towards an electrophilic transient species like singlet oxygen. Nimodipine had a photodegradation quantum yield of 2.34 x 10(-4) in deaereated acetonitrile and 1.81 x 10(-2) in deaereated ethanol. The values of the photodegradation quantum yields in aereated solutions were similar. However, felodipine is less photolabile than nimodipine, with a photodegradation quantum yield changing from 1.4 x 10(-5) to 7 x 10(-6) in the same solvents, probably a consequence of a lowered stability of the zwitterion radical involved in the formation of the photoproduct. In addition, nimodipine and felodipine were able to generate singlet oxygen with quantum yields of 0.085 and 0.003 in benzene, respectively. The results show that tested 1,4-DHPs behave as relatively good scavengers of excited oxygen, with overall rate constant values for nimodipine ranging from 0.38 x 105 M-1 s(-1) in chloroform to 9.73 x 10(5) M-1 s(-1) in N,N-dimethylformamide. On the other hand, the rate constants for felodipine ranged from 0.44 x 105 M-1 s(-1) in benzene to 19.5 x 10(5) M-1 s(-1) in N,N-dimethylacetaniide. In conclusion, the present results indicate that it is difficult to discriminate which specie is responsible for the photoallergic and phototoxic effects previously reported for these drugs, because these effects could be attributed to the participation of zwitterionic radicals in the process of photodegradation and/or its ability to generate singlet oxygen.en
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen
Publisherdc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCEen
Keywordsdc.subject1,4-dihydropyridinesen
Títulodc.titlePhotophysical and photochemical behavior of nimodipine and felodipineen
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record