Validity and reliability of the SF-36 in Chilean older adults: the ALEXANDROS study
Artículo
![Thumbnail](/themes/Mirage2/images/cubierta.jpg)
Open/ Download
Publication date
2013Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Lera Marques, Lydia
Cómo citar
Validity and reliability of the SF-36 in Chilean older adults: the ALEXANDROS study
Abstract
To validate short-form-36 health survey (SF-36)
with specific scoring algorithm obtained in a large sample of
Chilean older people and to associate quality of life in this
sample with social and health related factors. A cross-sectional
study on 2,143 community-living subjects aged 60–92
years (33 % men and 67 % women) conducted in Santiago,
Chile. Scores in 8 scales of SF-36-physical function (PF), role
physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH),
vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE)
and mental health (MH)-, were calculated. Factor analysis
was used to extract two principal factors and logistic
regression model was applied to estimate its association with
socio-demographic and health variables. The internal consistency
of scales was high (Cronbach’s alpha 0.86–0.87).
Factor analysis retained two factors: mental (MCS) and
physical (PCS) components accounting for 65.3 % of total
variance (55.3 and 10.0 % respectively). High correlations
(0.61–0.94) between MCS and MH, V, RE and SF were
obtained. PCS correlated highest (0.72–0.86) with RP, PF
and BP. Self-perceived symptoms of depression (GDS-15
C5) was the main variable explaining low scores in both
MCS and PCS (adjusted OR = 26.9; 95 % CI: 15.3–47.2;
OR = 3.4; 95 % CI: 2.1–5.5, respectively). We have demonstrated
the reliability and validity of SF-36 questionnaire to
evaluate health related quality of life, reporting Chilean-Specific
factor score coefficients for MCS and PCS based in
national Chilean means and standard deviations for older
people. After adjusting by age and gender, themain predictors
of low health related QoL in Chilean older people were selfperceived
symptoms of depression, the presence of two or
more chronic diseases and illiteracy. Important gender
inequalities were observed in all of these results, being consistently
less favorable inwomen than in men.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Quote Item
Eur J Ageing (2013) 10:127–134
Collections