Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCifuentes Díaz, Marcela es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorHervé E., Béatrice es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorFica Cubillos, Alberto 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2011-06-14T18:37:00Z
Available datedc.date.available2011-06-14T18:37:00Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2011-04
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationREVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA Volume: 28 Issue: 2 Pages: 130-151 Published: APR 2011es_CL
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0716-1018
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/124184
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIes_CL
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe best strategy to resolve the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is unsettled, and periodic reviews of new evidence are necessary. An update was performed to renew the 2001 recommendations on the diagnosis of this condition by The Chilean Society of Infectious Diseases. The main proposals are: to incorporate a microbiology-based strategy when there is a suspicion of VAP to gather local epidemiologic data and design appropriate empirical therapy for next cases, and to apply a non-invasive approach such as an endotracheal aspirate or mini-bronchoalveolar lavage, to facilitate accessibility and lower costs. There is no advantage on survival using either quantitative or qualitative cultures for VAP and a definite recommendation cannot be issued. Nonetheless, quantitative cultures are more specific and could facilitate to reject the diagnosis, look for other alternatives, and avoid unnecessary antibiotics. Biomarkers to assist VAP diagnosis are not recommended due to their poor performance. However, serial procalcitonin determinations have been useful to decrease antibiotic use in critical care patients and this biomarker has a better diagnostic yield than C reactive protein in this setting. This consensus also recommends discriminating VAP from ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT). The latter represents a separate entity characterized by an inflammatory response with purulent tracheal secretions but without new pulmonary infiltrates. Although preliminary data supports a beneficial effect of antibiotics to treat this condition, evidence is limited yet, and both conditions deserve to be discriminated (VAP versus VAT).es_CL
Lenguagedc.language.isoeses_CL
Publisherdc.publisherSOC CHILENA INFECTOLOGIAes_CL
Keywordsdc.subjectdiagnosises_CL
Títulodc.titleActualización del Consenso “Neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica” Primera parte. Aspectos diagnósticoses_CL
Title in another languagedc.title.alternativeUpdate of the consensus document on ventilator-associated pneumonia. Part I. Diagnostic aspectses_CL
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record