Ausencia de una perspectiva de género en la Corte Penal Internacional: una mirada al caso Fiscalía vs. Lubanga Dyilo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Morales Cerda, Natalia Paz
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2017-03-02T14:22:01Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2017-03-02T14:22:01Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional. Penal Volumen: 4 Páginas: 65-85
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.12804/anidip04.01.2016.03
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/142952
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The lack of a gender perspective in the work of the International Criminal Court is one of the main shortcomings of the current international criminal system. This has had consequences which are evident in the case against Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, which has left a significant debt to the functioning of the organs of the International Criminal Court. The International Criminal Court must invoke a continuum in the consecration of fundamental human rights and accommodate the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the subject, whose foundation as an applicable law is found in paragraph 3 Article 21 of the Rome Statute. Discrimination based on gender is structural and requires the adoption of effective measures by the international community for its eradication. In this regard, the International Criminal Court has to recognize gender as a transformational element of law, identify common trends in the subordination of women which have typically motivated gender based crimes, and consider this while determining sentences with gender content.