Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCantillano, Pablo 
Authordc.contributor.authorRubio, Fabián 
Authordc.contributor.authorNaser González, Alfredo 
Authordc.contributor.authorNazar Saffie, Rodolfo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-07-09T22:35:09Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-07-09T22:35:09Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationActa Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2017; 68(1): 1-8es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0001-6519
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/149701
Abstractdc.description.abstractIntroduction and objectives: Endoscopic sinonasal surgery is the procedure of choice in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis and sinonasal polyposis refractory to medical treatment, with high rates of success (76%-97.5%). However, 2.5%-24% of those patients will require revision surgery (RESS). In this study, we present the clinical, anatomical, radiological and histological features of patients receiving RESS in our centre during a 3-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of clinical, anatomical, radiological and histopathological data of patients receiving revision endoscopic sinonasal surgery between 2012 and 2014 was carried out. Results: From 299 surgery procedures performed, 27 (9%) were revision surgeries. The mean patient age was 46 years, with a male/female ratio of 1.4/1. The most frequent preoperative and postoperative diagnosis was chronic polypoid rhinosinusitis. The mean time since the previous surgery was 6.1 years, with 11.9 months of mean follow-up since that surgery. Stenotic antrostomy was found during revision in 81.5% of the patients and incomplete anterior ethmoidectomy and persistent uncinate process, in 59.3%. In radiology, 70.4% of patients had persistent anterior ethmoidal cells. Antrostomy or widening of antrostomy was performed in 96.3% of cases and anterior ethmoidectomy or completion of it was performed in 66.7%. Conclusions: Polyps, stenotic antrostomy and incomplete ethmoidectomy were the most frequent causes of revision surgery, in concordance with the procedures performed. The patients had long periods of time without follow-up between surgeries. Further investigation is necessary to generate measures to reduce the number of revision surgeries.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceActa Otorrinolaringológica Españolaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEndoscopic sinonasal surgeryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSinusitises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPolyposises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEndoscopyes_ES
Títulodc.titleRevision endoscopic sinonasal surgeryes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadortjnes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile