Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorSani, Gabriele 
Authordc.contributor.authorVöhringer, Paul A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBarroilhet Diez, Sergio 
Authordc.contributor.authorKoukopoulos, Alexia E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorNassir Ghaemi, S. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-07-17T17:12:17Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-07-17T17:12:17Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Affective Disorders, 232 (2018): 9–16es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.025
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/149948
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: It has been proposed that the broad major depressive disorder (MDD) construct is heterogenous. Koukopoulos has provided diagnostic criteria for an important subtype within that construct, "mixed depression" (MxD), which encompasses clinical pictures characterized by marked psychomotor or inner excitation and rage/ anger, along with severe depression. This study provides psychometric validation for the first rating scale specifically designed to assess MxD symptoms cross-sectionally, the Koukopoulos Mixed Depression Rating Scale (KMDRS). Methods: 350 patients from the international mood network (IMN) completed three rating scales: the KMDRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). KMDRS’ psychometric properties assessed included Cronbach's alpha, inter-rater reliability, factor analysis, predictive validity, and Receiver Operator Curve analysis. Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76; 95% CI 0.57, 0.94) and interrater reliability (kappa = 0.73) were adequate. Confirmatory factor analysis identified 2 components: anger and psychomotor excitation (80% of total variance). Good predictive validity was seen (C-statistic = 0.82 95% CI 0.68, 0.93). Severity cutoff scores identified were as follows: none (0–4), possible (5–9), mild (10–15), moderate (16–20) and severe (> 21) MxD. Limitations: Non DSM-based diagnosis of MxD may pose some difficulties in the initial use and interpretation of the scoring of the scale. Moreover, the cross-sectional nature of the evaluation does not verify the long-term stability of the scale. Conclusions: KMDRS was a reliable and valid instrument to assess MxD symptomses_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipInnovation and Competitiveness (FIC) of the Chilean Ministry of Economy, Development and Tourism, through the Millennium Scientific Initiative, Grant Number IS130005.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Affective Disorderses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectIrritabilityes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMixed depressiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPsychomotor agitationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRating scalees_ES
Títulodc.titleThe Koukopoulos Mixed Depression Rating Scale (KMDRS): an International Mood Network (IMN) validation study of a new mixed mood rating scalees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadortjnes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile