Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCaballero, Ricardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorEngel Goetz, Eduardo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-08-16T19:47:33Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-08-16T19:47:33Z
Publication datedc.date.issued1999
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationEconometrica, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 783 - 826, Julio, 1999es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0012-9682
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/151045
Abstractdc.description.abstractIn this paper we derive a model of aggregate investment that builds from the lumpymicroeconomic behavior of firms facing stochastic fixed adjustment costs. Instead of theŽ.standard sharp S, s bands, firms’ adjustment policies take the form of a probability ofŽ.adjustment adjustment hazard that responds smoothly to changes in firms’ capacity gap.The model has appealing aggregation properties, and yields nonlinear aggregate timeseries processes. The passivity of normal times is, occasionally, more than offset by thebrisk response to large accumulated shocks. Using within and out-of-sample criteria, wefind that the model performs substantially better than the standard linear models ofinvestment for postwar sectoral U.S. manufacturing equipment and structures investmentdata.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipWe are grateful to Olivier Blanchard, Whitney Newey, James Stock, an editor, three anonymousreferees, and seminar participants at Brown, CEPR-Champoussin, Chicago, Columbia, EconometricŽ.Society Meetings Caracas and Tokyo , EFCC, Harvard, IMPA, LSE, NBER, Princeton, Rochester,Ž.SITE, Toronto, U. de Chile, and Yale for their comments. Financial support to Caballero from theŽ. Ž .National Science and Sloan Foundations and to Engel from FONDECYT Grant 195-510 and theŽ.Mellon Foundation Grant 9608 is gratefully acknowledged.2Since plants’ entry is excluded from their sample, these statistics are likely to represent lowerbounds on the degree of lumpiness in plants’ investment patterns.3We use the word ‘‘project’’ to emphasize the fact that the actual implementation of a projectmay cover more than a year-observation; realistic time-to-build aspects of investment are not incontradiction with the view that investment episodes are lumpy in nature.4Ž.See Chirinko 1994 for a survey of the empirical investment literature.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherThe Econometric Societyes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceEconometricaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectInvestmentes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectadjustment costses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectadjustment hazardes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectaggregationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectheterogene-ityes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectlumpinesses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectnonlinear time serieses_ES
Títulodc.titleExplaining investment dynamics in U.S. manufacturing: a generalized (S; s) approaches_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrcaes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile