Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorChambers, Robert G. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLópez Vega, Ramón 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T16:26:39Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-08-22T16:26:39Z
Publication datedc.date.issued1993
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationEconomics Letters Vol. 41, No. 3, 1993, Pages 287-292es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0165-1765
Identifierdc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)90155-6
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/151140
Abstractdc.description.abstractThis paper compares the welfare effects of ad valorem and fixed-price distortions for an open economy. In the case of export protection, domestic factor growth is much more likely to be immiserizing when fixed-price distortions are used. In contrast, fixed price protection to an import-substitute is less likely to induce immiserization via factor growth than ad valorem protection.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceEconomics Letterses_ES
Títulodc.titleFixed price controls and ad valorem distortions in an open economyes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrcaes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile