Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorDe Amorím Fernández, Fernando 
Authordc.contributor.authorPeix, Amalia 
Authordc.contributor.authorGiubbini, Raffaele 
Authordc.contributor.authorKarthikeyan, Ganesan 
Authordc.contributor.authorMassardo Vega, Teresa 
Authordc.contributor.authorPatel, Chetan 
Authordc.contributor.authorPabón, Luz M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorJiménez Heffernan, Amelia 
Authordc.contributor.authorAlexanderson, Erick 
Authordc.contributor.authorButt, Sadaf 
Authordc.contributor.authorKumar, Alka 
Authordc.contributor.authorMarín, Víctor 
Authordc.contributor.authorMorozova, Olga 
Authordc.contributor.authorPáez, Diana 
Authordc.contributor.authorMesquita, Claudio T. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGarcía, Ernest 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T19:41:55Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-04-20T19:41:55Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Nuclear Cardiology (2020)es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1007/s12350-020-02397-6
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/179191
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground Gated myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (GMPS) phase analysis is an important tool to investigate the physiology of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. We aimed to test the performance of GMPS LV function and phase analysis in different clinical settings and on a diverse population. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective, non-randomized, multinational, multicenter cohort study. Clinical evaluation and GMPS prior to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)(baseline) and 6-month post CRT (follow-up) were done. LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV phase standard deviation (LVPSD), and percentage of left ventricle non-viable (PLVNV) were obtained by 10 centers and compared to the core lab. Results 276 GMPS studies had all data available from individual sites and from core lab. There were no statistically significant differences between all variables except for LVPSD. When subjects with no mechanical dyssynchrony were excluded, LVPSD difference became non-significant. LVESV, LVEF, LVPSD and PLVNV had strong correlation in site against core lab comparison. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement. Conclusions The presented correlation and agreement of LV function and dyssynchrony analysis over different sites with a diverse sample corroborate the strength of GMPS in the management of heart failure in clinical practice.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipInternational Atomic Energy Agencyes_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSpringeres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Nuclear Cardiologyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMPIes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGated SPECTes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPhase analysises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDyssynchronyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHeart failurees_ES
Títulodc.titleReproducibility of global LV function and dyssynchrony parameters derived from phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: A multicenter comparison with core laboratory settinges_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile