Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorHenrique Bof, Pedro
Authordc.contributor.authorFernades Marques, Guilherme
Authordc.contributor.authorTilmant, Amaury
Authordc.contributor.authorDalcin, Ana Paula
Authordc.contributor.authorOlivares Acuña, Marcelo Osvaldo
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-12-01T12:39:58Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-12-01T12:39:58Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationWater 2021, 13, 817es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.3390/w13060817
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182973
Abstractdc.description.abstractGiven its potentialities and characteristics, energy generation, food production, and water availability have a strong interdependency and correlation. Water is needed to produce energy and food, while energy is required to produce water and food. This nexus brings several challenges when scarce water resources must be allocated among competing uses, often in the form of unexpected tradeoffs. Addressing those challenges requires knowledge about the water–food– energy nexus and the associated tradeoffs to support water allocation and management decisions. Those tradeoffs are still not properly understood in the uncertain and stochastic context of water availability. When not properly accounted for, the results are conflicts, loss of investments, environmental impacts, and limited effectiveness of sectoral policies, all of which undermine a country’s development model relying on water and energy security. This paper addresses the competitive uses of recent irrigated agriculture expansion and existing hydropower production in a Brazilian watershed with water conflicts, assessing the economic tradeoffs and water values between energy and irrigated agricultural production under uncertainty. An explicitly stochastic hydro-economic model is used to determine water’s economic value and its variation in space and time. Results indicate that the agricultural benefits outweigh the potential energy losses, and the best course of action should explore an economically compensated reallocation strategy, upon negotiation among users, rather than imposing water supply cutbacks to the agriculture sector.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQ) 201185/2011-3 Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) 88881.065004/2014-01es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherMDPIes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceWateres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectWater resources economicses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMarginal value of wateres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEconomic tradeoffses_ES
Títulodc.titleWater–food–energy nexus tradeoffs in the São Marcos river basines_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States