Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCastañeda, Luis E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Christian C. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorFuentes-Contreras, Eduardo es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorNiemeyer Marich, August es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorNespolo, Roberto F. es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2011-08-08T13:42:58Z
Available datedc.date.available2011-08-08T13:42:58Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2010-02-26
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, Volume: 56, Issue: 9, Pages: 1058-1064, DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.02.019, 2010es_CL
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0022-1910
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119255
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISI.es_CL
Abstractdc.description.abstract‘Superclones’ are predominant and time-persistent genotypes, exhibiting constant fitness across different environments. However, causes of this ecological success are still unknown. Therefore, we studied the physiological mechanisms that could explain this success, evaluating the effects of wheat chemical defences on detoxification enzymes [cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450), glutathione Stransferases (GST), esterases (EST)], standardmetabolic rate (SMR), and fitness-related traits [adult body mass and intrinsic rate of increase (rm)] of two ‘superclones’ (Sa1 and Sa2) of the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. Additionally, we compared ‘superclones’ with a less-frequent genotype (Sa46). Genotypes were reared on three wheat cultivars with different levels of hydroxamic acids (Hx; wheat chemical defences). Detoxification enzymes and SMR did not differ between wheat hosts. However, GST and EST were different between ‘superclones’ and Sa46, while Sa1 showed a higher SMR than Sa2 or Sa46 (p = 0.03). Differences between genotypes were found for rm, which was higher for Sa1 than for Sa2 or Sa46. For all cases, genotype–host interactions were non-significant, except for aphid body mass. In conclusion, ‘superclones’ exhibit a broad host range, flat energetic costs for non-induced detoxification enzymes, and low variation in their reproductive performance on different defended hosts. However, physiological specialization of ‘superclones’ that could explain their ecological success was not evident in this study.es_CL
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by CONICYT doctoral AT-24060132 and CONICYT-PBCT Anillos ACT-38 grants. Luis E. Castan˜eda was supported by FONDECYT 3090056.es_CL
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_CL
Publisherdc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDes_CL
Keywordsdc.subjectHydroxamic acidses_CL
Títulodc.titlePhysiological approach to explain the ecological success of 'superclones' in aphids: Interplay between detoxification enzymes, metabolism and fitnesses_CL
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record