Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMarín Game, Gonzalo es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorDurán, Ernesto es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorMorales, Cristian es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorGonzález-Cabrera, Cristian es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorSentis, Elisa es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorMpodozis Marín, Jorge es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorLetelier Parga, Juan 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2012-06-19T14:48:44Z
Available datedc.date.available2012-06-19T14:48:44Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2012-01-18
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Neuroscience, January 18, 2012 • 32(3):1110 –1122es_CL
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4151-11.2012
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119506
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIes_CL
Abstractdc.description.abstractWhen a salient object in the visual field captures attention, the neural representation of that object is enhanced at the expense of competing stimuli. How neural activity evoked by a salient stimulus evolves to take precedence over the neural activity evoked by other stimuli is a matter of intensive investigation. Here, we describe in pigeons (Columba livia) how retinal inputs to the optic tectum (TeO, superior colliculus in mammals), triggered by moving stimuli, are selectively relayed on to the rotundus (Rt, caudal pulvinar) in the thalamus, and to its pallial target, the entopallium (E, extrastriate cortex).Weshow that two satellite nuclei of the TeO, the nucleus isthmi parvocelullaris (Ipc) and isthmi semilunaris (SLu), send synchronized feedback signals across tectal layers. Preventing the feedback from Ipc but not from SLu to a tectal location suppresses visual responses to moving stimuli from the corresponding region of visual space in all Rt subdivisions. In addition, the bursting feedback from the Ipc imprints a bursting rhythm on the visual signals, such that the visual responses of the Rt and the E acquire a bursting modulation significantly synchronized to the feedback from Ipc. As the Ipc feedback signals are selected by competitive interactions, the visual responses within the receptive fields in the Rt tend to synchronize with the tectal location receiving the “winning” feedback from Ipc. We propose that this selective transmission of afferent activity combined with the cross-regional synchronization of the areas involved represents a bottom-up mechanism by which salient stimuli capture attention.es_CL
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_CL
Títulodc.titleAttentional Capture? Synchronized Feedback Signals from the Isthmi Boost Retinal Signals to Higher Visual Areases_CL
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record