The isotopic composition and insect content of diet predict tissue isotopic values in a South American passerine assemblage
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sabat Kirkwood, Alejandro Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ramírez Otárola, Natalia
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bozinovic, Francisco
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez del Río, Carlos
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-01-29T15:35:20Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-01-29T15:35:20Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
J Comp Physiol B (2013) 183:419–430
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI 10.1007/s00360-012-0711-6
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119727
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
We analyzed the carbon and nitrogen isotopic
values of the muscle, liver, and crop contents (‘‘diet’’) of
132 individuals of 16 species of Chilean birds. The nitrogen
content of diet was tightly correlated with the fraction
of gut contents represented by insects relative to plant
material. The carbon and nitrogen isotopic values of diet,
liver, and muscle were all linearly correlated, implying
high temporal consistency in the isotopic value of the diet
of these birds. However, d15N was not significantly related
with the percentage of insects in diet. These results cast
doubt on the applicability of the use of 15N enrichment to
diagnose trophic level in, at least some, terrestrial ecosystems.
However, the residuals of the relationship relating the
isotopic value of bird tissues with those of their diet were
weakly negatively correlated with insect intake. We
hypothesize that this negative correlation stems from the
higher quality of protein found in insects relative to that of
plant materials. Finally, our data corroborated a perplexing
and controversial negative relationship between tissue to
diet isotopic discrimination and the isotopic value of diet.
We suggest that this relationship is an example of the
commonly observed regression to the mean effect that
plagues many scientific studies.