Why is quercetin a better antioxidant than taxifolin? Theoretical study of mechanisms involving activated forms
Author
dc.contributor.author
Osorio, Edison
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pérez, Edwin G.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Areche Medina, Carlos
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ruiz, Lina María
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cassels Niven, Bruce
Author
dc.contributor.author
Florez, Elizabeth
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tiznado, William
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-02-03T20:31:44Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-02-03T20:31:44Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
J Mol Model (2013) 19:2165–2172
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI 10.1007/s00894-012-1732-5
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119755
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The stronger antioxidant capacity of the flavonoid
quercetin (Q) compared with taxifolin (dihydroquercetin,
T) has been the subject of previous experimental
and theoretical studies. Theoretical work has focused on
the analysis of hydrogen bond dissociation energies
(BDE) of the OH phenolic groups, but consider mechanisms
that only involve the transfer of one hydrogen
atom. In the present work we consider other mechanisms
involving a second hydrogen transfer in reactions with
free radicals. The relative stability of the radicals formed
after the first hydrogen transfer reaction is considered in
discussing the antioxidant activity of Q and T. In terms
of global and local theoretical reactivity descriptors, we
propose that the radical arising from Q should be more
persistent in the environment and with the capability to
react with a second radical by hydrogen transfer, proton
transfer and electron transfer mechanisms. These mechanisms
could be responsible of the stronger antioxidant
capacity of Q.