Schizanthus grahamii and Schizanthus hookeri. Is there any relationship between their anthocyanin compositions and their different pollination syndromes?
Author
dc.contributor.author
Alcalde Eon, C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rivas Gonzalo, Julián C.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Muñoz Muñoz, Orlando
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Escribano Bailón, M. T.
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-03-13T14:29:36Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-03-13T14:29:36Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Phytochemistry 85 (2013) 62–71
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
doi 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.09.013
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119791
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Three different pollination syndromes (bee, hummingbird and moth-pollination syndromes) have been
described for the different species of the genus Schizanthus Ruiz & Pav. (Solanaceae). Two closely related
species from a phylogenetic point of view, Schizanthus grahamii and Schizanthus hookeri, show hummingbird
and bee-pollination syndromes, respectively. One of the traits used to assign these pollination syndromes
is the colour of the petals, which is red in S. grahamii and bluish-pink in S. hookeri. The objective of
this work was to establish the differences in the anthocyanin composition of these two Schizanthus species
that contribute to the different pollination syndrome. Identification of the pigments was carried out
from the chromatographic and spectral data supplied by the HPLC-DAD-MSn analyses of the samples.
Alkaline and acid hydrolyses were also performed in the extracts and in some isolated compounds in
order to confirm the identities. First difference between these two species was found in the total anthocyanin
content, which was about 13-fold higher in S. grahamii than in S. hookeri. Furthermore, the major
peak was also different in both cases, thus explaining quantitative and qualitative colour differences
between species. Delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside represented ca. 72% of the total area in S. grahamii and petanin
(Petunidin 3-O-p-coumaroylrutinoside-5-O-glucoside) accounted for almost 62% of the total area in
S. hookeri. The presence of the p-coumaroylrutinosyl moiety in the petanin makes the intramolecular
copigmentation possible, thus conferring the bluish-pink hue to the petals of S. hookeri. Delphinidin 3-
O-rutinoside is in turn responsible for the red colour exhibited by the petals of S. grahamii and along with
other floral traits, responsible for the attraction of hummingbirds to the plant. Pigments structurally
related to petanin, which have been often detected in other genus of Solanaceae, were detected in both
species and in similar contents, supporting results from previous studies that pointed to a bee-pollinated
common ancestor for both species that further specialised acquiring traits attractive to hummingbirds
and among them, red colour of the petals which is mainly supplied by delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside.
Schizanthus grahamii and Schizanthus hookeri. Is there any relationship between their anthocyanin compositions and their different pollination syndromes?