Cognitive ecology in hummingbirds: the role of sexual dimorphism and Its anatomical correlates on memory
Author
dc.contributor.author
González Gómez, Paulina L.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Madrid López, Natalia
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Salazar, Juan E.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Suárez, Rodrigo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Razeto Barry, Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mpodozis Marín, Jorge
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bozinovic, Francisco
Author
dc.contributor.author
Vásquez Salfate, Rodrigo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-16T19:08:25Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-12-16T19:08:25Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Plos ONE March 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 3 | e90165
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090165
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119834
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
In scatter-hoarding species, several behavioral and neuroanatomical adaptations allow them to store and retrieve thousands
of food items per year. Nectarivorous animals face a similar scenario having to remember quality, location and
replenishment schedules of several nectar sources. In the green-backed firecrown hummingbird (Sephanoides sephanoides),
males are territorial and have the ability to accurately keep track of nectar characteristics of their defended food sources. In
contrast, females display an opportunistic strategy, performing rapid intrusions into males territories. In response, males
behave aggressively during the non-reproductive season. In addition, females have higher energetic demands due to higher
thermoregulatory costs and travel times. The natural scenario of this species led us to compared cognitive abilities and
hippocampal size between males and females. Males were able to remember nectar location and renewal rates significantly
better than females. However, the hippocampal formation was significantly larger in females than males. We discuss these
findings in terms of sexually dimorphic use of spatial resources and variable patterns of brain dimorphisms in birds.