Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorGutstein, Carolina S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorFigueroa Bravo, Constanza P. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorPyenson, Nicholas D. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorYury Yáñez, Roberto E. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorCanals Lambarri, Mauricio es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorCozzuol, Mario A. es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-01-05T18:50:42Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-01-05T18:50:42Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2014
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPalaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 400 (2014) 62–74en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.issnDOI: 0.1016/j.palaeo.2014.01.026
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119889
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractThis study compares the bony ear morphology of freshwater and marine odontocetes (toothed whales). Odontocetes are unique among marine mammals in two important respects: 1) they use echolocation; 2) at least three lineages have independently evolved obligate freshwater habits from marine ancestries. Freshwater odontocetes include the so-called “river dolphins,” a paraphyletic group that each evolved convergent external morphological characters that distinguish them from oceanic dolphins (Delphinoidea). In addition to their convergent externalmorphology, “river dolphins” all have echolocation that use one peak (narrow-band) frequency around 100 kHz, compared to oceanic delphinoidswhich use a two peak (bimodal) frequency ranging from 40 to 140 kHz. The differences in echolocation suggest that the sensory systems responsible for detecting these different sound frequencies should also differ, although quantitative assessments of the cetacean hearing system remain understudied and taxonomically undersampled. To test if ear bone morphology reflects underlying environmentally driven differences in echolocation ability,we assembled a dataset of odontocete periotics (n=114) from extant and fossil species. We examined 18 external and three internal linear periotic measurements, the latter of whichwere examined using cone-beamscanning tomography. Results frommultivariate canonical ordination analyses show that periotic height, periotic thickness and pars cochlearis width collectively explain the largest amount of interspecific variation in our dataset. Because these particular ear bone measurements correspond to acoustic hearing ranges,we propose that they are also proxies for environmental preference (i.e.,marine, freshwater and intermediate habitats) and may be useful for deciphering environmental preferences of extinct odontocetes.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipC.S.G was funded by CONICYT, Becas Chile, Departamento de Postgrado y Postítulo of the Vicerrectoría de Asuntos Académicos of Universidad de Chile and the Smithsonian Institution's Remington Kellogg Fund. This manuscript was also written with support from a NMNH Small Grant Award, the Smithsonian Institution's Remington Kellogg Fund and a National Geographic Society Committee on Research Exploration grant (8903-11) to N.D.P. R.E.Y.-Y. was funded by a master's degree CONICYTChile scholarship from the Programa de Formación de Capital Humano Avanzado. This paper is Caldera Paleontology Project contribution No. 2.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectRiver dolphinsen_US
Títulodc.titleHigh frequency echolocation, ear morphology, and the marine–freshwater transition: A comparative study of extant and extinct toothed whalesen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile