Correlation between single photon emission computed tomography, AgNOR count, and histomorphologic features in patients with active mandibular condylar hyperplasia
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso abierto
Publication date
2011Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Fariña, Rodrigo A.
Cómo citar
Correlation between single photon emission computed tomography, AgNOR count, and histomorphologic features in patients with active mandibular condylar hyperplasia
Author
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the association between nuclear medicine examination (single photon emission
computed tomography [SPECT]), histology, and Argyrophilic Nuclear Organizer Region (AgNOR) count
in patients with active condylar hyperplasia who have undergone condylectomy.
Patients and Methods: Eight patients with a diagnosis of active condylar hyperplasia and evidence of
facial asymmetry, with progressive deformation in time and on SPECT studies, were evaluated. The
relationship between the rate of technetium Tc 99 intake, cartilage layer thickness, and cellular activity
measured by recounting nucleolar organizers with AgNOR was evaluated.
Results: The 4 pathologic layers of condylar hyperplasia (fibrous, mesenchymal, and hypertrophic
chondrocyte layers and ossification layer) showed great variability and different thicknesses among
the cases analyzed. As age increased, the histologic layer thickness decreased (r 0.73, P .04). The age
of the patients was inversely related to the number of AgNOR dots (r 0.65, P .08). The thickness of
both mesenchymal and hypertrophic chondrocyte layers was related to cartilage island depth (r 0.81,
P .02).
Conclusions: Younger patients with condylar hyperplasia had a thicker condylar layer and more
cellular activity measured by AgNOR count. The histologic features of this group of patients could not
be associated with their SPECT findings.
Indexation
Artículo de publicación ISI
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/123535
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.184
ISSN: 0278-2391
Quote Item
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Feb;69(2):356-61
Collections