Prevalence, Characteristics, and Publication of Discontinued Randomized Trials
Artículo
Publication date
2014Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Kasenda, Benjamin
Cómo citar
Prevalence, Characteristics, and Publication of Discontinued Randomized Trials
Author
- Kasenda, Benjamin;
- Von Elm, Erik;
- You, John;
- Blümle, Anette;
- Tomonaga, Yuki;
- Saccilotto, Ramón;
- Amstutz, Alain;
- Bengough, Theresa;
- Meerpohl, Joerg J.;
- Stegert, Mihaela;
- Tikkinen, Kari A. O.;
- Neumann, Ignacio;
- Carrasco Labra, Alonso;
- Faulhaber, Markus;
- Mulla, Sohail M.;
- Mertz, Dominik;
- Akl, Elie A.;
- Bassler, Dirk;
- Busse, Jason W.;
- Ferreira González, Ignacio;
- Lamontagne, Francois;
- Nordmann, Alain;
- Gloy, Viktoria;
- Raatz, Heike;
- Moja, Lorenzo;
- Rosenthal, Rachel;
- Ebrahim, Shanil;
- Schandelmaier, Stefan;
- Xin, Sun;
- Vandvik, Per O.;
- Johnston, Bradley C.;
- Walter, Martin A.;
- Burnand, Bernard;
- Schwenkglenks, Matthias;
- Hemkens, Lars G.;
- Bucher, Heiner C.;
- Guyatt, Gordon H.;
- Briel, Matthias;
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The discontinuation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) raises ethical concerns
and often wastes scarce research resources. The epidemiology of discontinued RCTs,
however, remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence, characteristics, and publication history of
discontinued RCTs and to investigate factors associated with RCT discontinuation due to poor
recruitment and with nonpublication.
DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort of RCTs based on archived protocols approved by
6 research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and
2003.We recorded trial characteristics and planned recruitment from included protocols.
Last follow-up of RCTs was April 27, 2013.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Completion status, reported reasons for discontinuation,
and publication status of RCTs as determined by correspondence with the research ethics
committees, literature searches, and investigator surveys.
RESULTS After a median follow-up of 11.6 years (range, 8.8-12.6 years), 253 of 1017 included
RCTs were discontinued (24.9% [95%CI, 22.3%-27.6%]). Only 96 of 253 discontinuations
(37.9% [95%CI, 32.0%-44.3%]) were reported to ethics committees. The most frequent
reason for discontinuation was poor recruitment (101/1017; 9.9%[95%CI, 8.2%-12.0%]). In
multivariable analysis, industry sponsorship vs investigator sponsorship (8.4%vs 26.5%;
odds ratio [OR], 0.25 [95%CI, 0.15-0.43]; P < .001) and a larger planned sample size in
increments of 100 (-0.7%; OR, 0.96 [95%CI, 0.92-1.00]; P = .04) were associated with
lower rates of discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Discontinued trials were more likely
to remain unpublished than completed trials (55.1%vs 33.6%; OR, 3.19 [95%CI, 2.29-4.43];
P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this sample of trials based on RCT protocols from 6
research ethics committees, discontinuation was common, with poor recruitment being the
most frequently reported reason. Greater efforts are needed to ensure the reporting of trial
discontinuation to research ethics committees and the publication of results of discontinued
trials.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Patrocinador
This study was funded by the
Swiss National Science Foundation (grant
320030_133540/1) and the German Research
Foundation (grant EL 544/1-2). During study
preparation, Dr von Elm was supported by the
Brocher Foundation. Dr You is supported by a
Reseach Early Career Award from Hamilton Health
Sciences. Dr Tikkinen is funded by unrestricted
grants from the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the
Finnish Medical Foundation. Dr Mertz is a recipient
of a Research Early Career Award from Hamilton
Health Sciences Foundation (Jack Hirsh
Fellowship). Dr Busse is funded by a New
Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of
Health Research and Canadian Chiropractic
Research Foundation. Drs Nordmann, Gloy, Raatz,
Hemkens, Bucher, and Briel are supported by
Santésuisse and the Gottfried and Julia
Bangerter-Rhyner-Foundation.
Quote Item
Jama. 2014;311(10):1045-1051.
Collections