Effects of platelet-rich and -poor plasma on the reparative response of gingival fibroblasts
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cáceres, Mónica
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, Constanza
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Winkler, Jorge
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Smith, Patricio
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2013-12-26T15:26:03Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2013-12-26T15:26:03Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2012
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012, 1104–1111
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02274.x
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/124018
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proposed as a therapeutic tool to
enhance wound repair, the cellular and molecular mechanisms stimulated by this agent are still not
completely understood. The present study was designed to characterize the effects of PRP and
platelet-poor plasma (PPP) supernatants on cell responses involved in gingival tissue repair.
Methods: We studied the response of human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) to PRP and PPP fractions
on: matrix contraction, cell migration, myofibroblastic differentiation, production of matrix
components and proteolytic enzymes. PRP and PPP were obtained from donors using a commercial
kit. Matrix contraction was evaluated by means of collagen lattices in the presence of matrix
metalloproteinase (MMP) and actin polymerization inhibitors. The production of matrix molecules
and proteinases was assessed through Western-blot. RhoA activity was evaluated through a pulldown
assay. Actin distribution and focal adhesions were assessed through immunofluorescence.
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-b) was quantified through ELISA.
Results: Both PRP and PPP stimulated human gingival fibroblasts-populated collagen gel contraction
and Ilomastat and cytochalasin D inhibited this response. PRP and PPP also stimulated MT1-MMP and
TIMP-2 production, RhoA activation and actin cytoskeleton remodeling, cell migration/invasion and
myofibroblastic differentiation. TGF-b1 was found at significantly higher concentrations in PRP than
in PPP.
Conclusions: Both PRP and PPP promote wound tissue remodeling and contraction through the
stimulation of actin remodeling, the activity of MMPs, promotion of cell migration, and
myofibroblastic differentiation. The similar biological responses induced by PRP and PPP suggest
that both platelet-derived fractions may exert a positive effect on gingival repair.