Satiety responsiveness and eating behavior among Chilean adolescents and the role of breastfeeding
Author
dc.contributor.author
Reyes Jedlicki, Marcela
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hoyos, V.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, S. M.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lozoff, B.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Castillo Altmann, Marcela
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Burrows, Raquel
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Blanco, Estela
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gahagan, Sheila
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-01-07T18:55:40Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-01-07T18:55:40Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
International Journal of Obesity (2013), 1–6
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
doi:10.1038/ijo.2013.191
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/124036
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine patterns of satiety responsiveness and its relationship to eating in the absence of hunger (EAH),
in a cohort of adolescents. We also assessed whether sex, body mass index and duration of breastfeeding, during infancy,
predicted satiety responsiveness and eating behavior at 16 years.
METHODS: Adolescents (n¼576) from a longitudinal cohort, which began as an iron deficiency anemia preventive trial,
participated in an unlimited breakfast after an overnight fast, and reported satiety response on a visual analog scale after the meal,
followed by an EAH procedure. Height, weight and body composition were measured before breakfast. Latent profile analysis
generated profiles that captured individual differences in satiety responsiveness. Multivariable regressions, adjusted for potential
confounders, evaluated the association between: (1) satiety responsiveness and EAH, and (2) breastfeeding in infancy, satiety
responsiveness and EAH in adolescence.
RESULTS: Participants were on average 16.7-year old, 48% female, 37% overweight/obese and 76% were breastfed as the sole
source of milk for o6 months. We found three latent profiles of satiety responsiveness: 1: ‘responsive’ (49%); 2: ‘not responsive’
(41%); 3: ‘still hungry’ (10%). Participants in the ‘not responsive’ or ‘still hungry’ profile were more likely to eat during the EAH
procedure (odds ratio (OR)¼2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI)¼1.8–3.6). Being breastfed for o6 months was related to higher
odds of being in the ‘not responsive’ or ‘still hungry’ profile (OR¼1.8, 95% CI¼1.2–2.6) and EAH (OR¼2.2, 95% CI¼1.4–3.3).
Satiety responsiveness was not influenced by sex and overweight/obesity.
CONCLUSION: After an ad libitum meal, we found varied satiety responses, which related to EAH. Furthermore, shorter
breastfeeding duration was associated with poorer satiety response and higher consumption during an EAH procedure.
Understanding if breastfeeding influences the development of satiety responsiveness and eating behavior may be important
in an era characterized by abundant calorie-dense foods and a plethora of environmental cues promoting consumption.