Extension of the selection of protein chromatography and the rate model to affinity chromatographyy
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2010-08-03Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Sandoval, G.
Cómo citar
Extension of the selection of protein chromatography and the rate model to affinity chromatographyy
Abstract
The rational selection of optimal protein purification sequences, as well as mathematical models that simulate and
allow optimization of chromatographic protein purification processes have been developed for purification procedures
such as ion-exchange, hydrophobic interaction and gel filtration chromatography. This paper investigates the
extension of such analysis to affinity chromatography both in the selection of chromatographic processes and in the
use of the rate model for mathematical modelling and simulation. Two affinity systems were used: Blue Sepharose and
Protein A. The extension of the theory developed previously for ion-exchange and HIC chromatography to affinity
separations is analyzed in this paper. For the selection of operations two algorithms are used. In the first, the value of
h, which corresponds to the efficiency (resolution) of the actual chromatography and, S, which determines the
amount of a particular contaminant eliminated after each separation step, which determines the purity, have to be
determined. It was found that the value of both these parameters is not generic for affinity separations but will
depend on the type of affinity system used and will have to be determined on a case by case basis. With Blue
Sepharose a salt gradient was used and with Protein A, a pH gradient. Parameters were determined with individual
proteins and simulations of the protein mixtures were done. This approach allows investigation of chromatographic
protein purification in a holistic manner that includes ion-exchange, HIC, gel filtration and affinity separations for the
first time.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/125990
Quote Item
J. Mol. Recognit. 2010; 23: 609–617
Collections