Primary laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumor
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2011-01Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Castillo, Octavio A.
Cómo citar
Primary laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumor
Author
Abstract
Introduction: this report is intended to retrospectively assess cancer control and morbidity of primary laparoscopic reproperitoneal lymphadenectomy (L-RPLND) in patients with clinical Stage I non seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT).
Materials and methods: one hundred and sixty-four patients with clinical Stage I NSGCT underwent primary diagnostic LRPLND between 1993 and 2006. Patients were operated unilaterally limiting the dissection to templates. Kaplan Meier curves were generated estimating time to recurrence.
Results: of the 164 patients, 82 (48%) had embryonal components and 35 (20%) lymphovascular invasion in the orchiectomy specimen. The median (IQR) age, operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss and number of lymph nodes retrieved was 28 years (24-33), 135 minutes. (120180), 48 hours (24-48), 50 cc (20-100) and 14 (10-18) nodes, respectively. All patients had negative serum markers preoperatively.
Presence of lymph node metastasis was identified in 32 (19.5%) patients. Follow-up was available in 15 of these. Fourteen received adjuvant chemotherapy and 2 of them had recurrence at 3 and 64 months. Absence of lymph node metastasis was diagnosed in 132 (80.5%) patients. Follow-up was available in 80 of these. Among them 7 recurred (5 retroperitoneum, 2 lung), one of them 33 months after L-RPLND. Median follow-up for Patients without recurrence was 14 months (IQR:4-35). The cumulative 3-year recurrence free rate was 82% (95%CI: 64-91). Seventeen (10%) of 164 patients had intra or perioperative complications.
Conclusions: this is the largest series of L-RPLND performed in a single institution. Both morbidity and oncologic safety of this technique needs to be prospectively evaluated in randomized trials.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/128802
DOI: DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2010.08.004
ISSN: 0210-4806
Quote Item
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS Volume: 35 Issue: 1 Pages: 22-28 Published: JAN 2011
Collections