Effects of Trimetazidine in Nonischemic Heart Failure: A Randomized Study
Artículo
Access note
Acceso abierto
Publication date
2014Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Winter, José Luis
Cómo citar
Effects of Trimetazidine in Nonischemic Heart Failure: A Randomized Study
Author
- Winter, José Luis;
- Castro, Pablo F.;
- Quintana, Juan Carlos;
- Altamirano, Rodrigo;
- Enriquez, Andrés;
- Verdejo, Hugo E.;
- Jalil Milad, Jorge;
- Mellado, Rose Marie;
- Concepción, Roberto;
- Sepúlveda, Pablo;
- Rossel Mariángel, Víctor;
- Sepúlveda Morales, Luis;
- Chiong Lay, Mario;
- García Nannig, Lorena;
- Lavandero González, Sergio;
Abstract
Objectives: Heart failure (HF) is associated with changes in myocardial metabolism that lead to impairment
of contractile function. Trimetazidine (TMZ) modulates cardiac energetic efficiency and improves outcomes
in ischemic heart disease. We evaluated the effects of TMZ on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac
metabolism, exercise capacity, O2 uptake, and quality of life in patients with nonischemic HF.
Methods and Results: Sixty patients with stable nonischemic HF under optimal medical therapy were
included in this randomized double-blind study. Patients were randomized to TMZ (35 mg orally twice
a day) or placebo for 6 months. LVEF, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), maximum O2 uptake in cardiopulmonary
exercise test, different markers of metabolism, oxidative stress, and endothelial function, and quality
of life were assessed at baseline and after TMZ treatment. Left ventricular peak glucose uptake was evaluated
with the use of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron
emission tomography (18FDG-PET). Etiology was idiopathic in 85% and hypertensive in 15%. Both
groups were similar in age, functional class, LVEF, and levels of N-terminal proeB-type natriuretic peptide
at baseline. After 6 months of TMZ treatment, no changes were observed in LVEF (31 6 10% vs 34
6 8%; P 5 .8), 6MWT (443 6 25 m vs 506 6 79 m; P 5 .03), maximum O2 uptake (19.1 6 5.0 mL kg 1
min
1 vs 23.0 6 7.2 mL kg
1 min
1; P 5 .11), functional class (percentages of patients in functional
classes I/II/III/IV 10/3753/0 vs 7/40/50/3; P 5 .14), or quality of life (32 6 26 points vs 24 6 18 points;
P 5 .25) in TMZ versus placebo, respectively. In the subgroup of patients evaluated with 18FDG-PET, no
significant differences were observed in SUV between both groups (7.0 6 3.6 vs 8.2 6 3.4 respectively;
P 5 .47).
Conclusions: In patients with nonischemic HF, the addition of TMZ to optimal medical treatment does
not result in significant changes of LVEF, exercise capacity, O2 uptake, or quality of life.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129480
DOI: DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.01.004
Quote Item
Journal of Cardiac Failure Vol. 20 No. 3 2014
Collections