Microsatellite Markers Reveal Strong Genetic Structure in the Endemic Chilean Dolphin
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pérez Álvarez, María José
Author
dc.contributor.author
Olavarría, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Moraga, Rodrigo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Scott Baker, C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hamner, Rebecca
Author
dc.contributor.author
Poulin, Elie
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-07-30T15:29:22Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-07-30T15:29:22Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123956, apr 21 2015
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1371/journal.pone.0123956
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/132253
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Understanding genetic differentiation and speciation processes in marine species with high dispersal capabilities is challenging. The Chilean dolphin, Cephalorhynchus eutropia, is the only endemic cetacean of Chile and is found in two different coastal habitats: a northern habitat with exposed coastlines, bays and estuaries from Valparaiso (33 degrees 02'S) to Chiloe (42 degrees 00'S), and a southern habitat with highly fragmented inshore coastline, channels and fjords between Chiloe and Navarino Island (55 degrees 14'S). With the aim of evaluating the potential existence of conservation units for this species, we analyzed the genetic diversity and population structure of the Chilean dolphin along its entire range. We genotyped 21 dinucleotide microsatellites for 53 skin samples collected between 1998 and 2012 (swab: n = 8, biopsy: n = 38, entanglement n = 7). Bayesian clustering and spatial model analyses identified two genetically distinct populations corresponding to the northern and southern habitats. Genetic diversity levels were similar in the two populations (He: 0.42 v/s 0.45 for southern and northern populations, respectively), while effective size population was higher in the southern area (Ne: 101 v/s 39). Genetic differentiation between these two populations was high and significant (F-ST = 0.15 and R-ST = 0.19), indicating little or no current gene flow. Because of the absence of evident geographical barriers between the northern and southern populations, we propose that genetic differentiation may reflect ecological adaptation to the different habitat conditions and resource uses. Therefore, the two genetic populations of this endemic and Near Threatened species should be considered as different conservation units with independent management strategies.