Umbilical artery half peak systolic velocity deceleration time throughout pregnancy and its role in fetuses with bradycardia
Artículo
Publication date
2007Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Bustos Vidal, Juan
Cómo citar
Umbilical artery half peak systolic velocity deceleration time throughout pregnancy and its role in fetuses with bradycardia
Abstract
Objectives To describe a new technique for Doppler
waveform quantification of the fetal umbilical artery,
the half peak systolic velocity (h-PSV) deceleration time,
which measures the time that it takes a single flow velocity
waveform to halve its maximum systolic velocity. As this
measurement is independent of fetal heart rate, its role in
the evaluation of placental vascular resistance in fetuses
with bradycardia was also explored.
Methods The umbilical artery impedance indices and the
h-PSV deceleration time were measured in 532 normal
singleton fetuses from 17 to 41 weeks of gestation. A
nomogram was established and its usefulness in assessing
fetuses with bradycardia was evaluated.
Results The relationship between umbilical artery h-PSV
deceleration time and gestational age was best described
by a linear formula (y = 6.5523x + 12.41; R2 = 0.6346),
h-PSV deceleration time increasing by 6.6 ms per week.
The correlation coefficients for the 95th, 50th and 5th
centiles were 0.97, 0.98 and 0.98, respectively. Measurement
of h-PSV deceleration time was reproducible, with
interobserver and intraobserver variabilities of 10.7%
and 7.4%, respectively. Among fetuses with bradycardia
(n = 7), the h-PSV deceleration time was above the 5th
centile in all cases, suggesting normal placental function in
spite of abnormally increased impedance indices obtained
with traditional Doppler indices in six.
Conclusions The h-PSV deceleration time increases
linearly during the second and third trimesters of
pregnancy. As its measurement is reproducible and
independent of heart rate, it may be useful in the assessment of well-being in fetuses with bradycardia.
Quote Item
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 952–957
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: