Differences in learning and memory of host plant features between specialist and generalist phytophagous insects
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tapia, Daniel H.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Silva, Andrea X.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ballesteros, Gabriel I.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Figueroa, Christian C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Niemeyer Marich, August
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ramírez, Claudio C.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-11-02T18:07:48Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-11-02T18:07:48Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Animal Behaviour 106 (2015) 1-10
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.027
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/134799
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Insects are able to learn from experience acquired in their natal habitat, thereby obtaining adaptive
advantages. However, the acquisition of new information could involve defects in retrieving previously
learned information (i.e. forgetting), a process known as retroactive interference, which diminishes
learning capacities. In this study, we evaluated the learning capacity and the impact of retroactive
interference during host searching by ecological specialist and generalist phytophagous insects. We
examined whether the generalist aphid, Myzus persicae s. str., and the tobacco-specialized subspecies,
Myzus persicae nicotianae differ in (1) learning capacity, or (2) retroactive interference during host selection,
and (3) whether the learning-associated foraging gene (for) is differentially expressed. Differences
in learning capacity and retroactive interference were assessed in bioassays using rearing hosts and
alternative hosts followed by choices between or transferences to rearing or alternative hosts. During the
pre-alighting phase of host searching, the generalist aphid showed attraction to the alternative host after
12 h of experience, while the specialist showed no attraction to the alternative host regardless of the
amount of time on the plant. The retroactive interference experiments showed that when aphids were
exposed to an alternative host for different periods, odour attraction to the rearing host persisted in the
generalist after 72 h of experience on the alternative host, whereas in the specialist the attraction to the
rearing host was lost after 12 h of experience on the alternative host. During the post-alighting phase of
host searching, both taxa performed better on their rearing hosts, but in the specialist aphid, a short
period on the alternative host reversed this behaviour. In addition, the specialist showed lower levels of
gene for expression, which could be associated with the differences in learning performance. Herein we
present further evidence of differences in learning capacities between a specialist and a generalist aphid,
which may influence the process of host searching and evolution of ecological specialization.
en_US
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
International Foundation for Science
C/4712-1
Fondecyt
1100746
1090378
Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio grant
NC120027