Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorTapia, Daniel H. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSilva, Andrea X. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBallesteros, Gabriel I. 
Authordc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Christian C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorNiemeyer Marich, August 
Authordc.contributor.authorRamírez, Claudio C. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-11-02T18:07:48Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-11-02T18:07:48Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationAnimal Behaviour 106 (2015) 1-10en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.027
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/134799
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractInsects are able to learn from experience acquired in their natal habitat, thereby obtaining adaptive advantages. However, the acquisition of new information could involve defects in retrieving previously learned information (i.e. forgetting), a process known as retroactive interference, which diminishes learning capacities. In this study, we evaluated the learning capacity and the impact of retroactive interference during host searching by ecological specialist and generalist phytophagous insects. We examined whether the generalist aphid, Myzus persicae s. str., and the tobacco-specialized subspecies, Myzus persicae nicotianae differ in (1) learning capacity, or (2) retroactive interference during host selection, and (3) whether the learning-associated foraging gene (for) is differentially expressed. Differences in learning capacity and retroactive interference were assessed in bioassays using rearing hosts and alternative hosts followed by choices between or transferences to rearing or alternative hosts. During the pre-alighting phase of host searching, the generalist aphid showed attraction to the alternative host after 12 h of experience, while the specialist showed no attraction to the alternative host regardless of the amount of time on the plant. The retroactive interference experiments showed that when aphids were exposed to an alternative host for different periods, odour attraction to the rearing host persisted in the generalist after 72 h of experience on the alternative host, whereas in the specialist the attraction to the rearing host was lost after 12 h of experience on the alternative host. During the post-alighting phase of host searching, both taxa performed better on their rearing hosts, but in the specialist aphid, a short period on the alternative host reversed this behaviour. In addition, the specialist showed lower levels of gene for expression, which could be associated with the differences in learning performance. Herein we present further evidence of differences in learning capacities between a specialist and a generalist aphid, which may influence the process of host searching and evolution of ecological specialization.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipInternational Foundation for Science C/4712-1 Fondecyt 1100746 1090378 Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio grant NC120027en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectecological specializationen_US
Keywordsdc.subjecthost selectionen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectinsect-plant relationshipen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectlearningen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectMyzus persicaeen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectretroactive interferenceen_US
Títulodc.titleDifferences in learning and memory of host plant features between specialist and generalist phytophagous insectsen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile