Can we infer vegetation change from peat carbon and nitrogen content? A palaeoecological test from Tasmania, Australia
Author
dc.contributor.author
Fletcher, Michael-Shawn
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cadd, Haidee
Author
dc.contributor.author
Haberle, Simon
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-12-16T13:26:37Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-12-16T13:26:37Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Holocene, Vol. 25, No. 11 (2015), 1-9
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1177/0959683615591354
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/135776
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
We set out to test the ability to detect vegetation change from organic soil nutrient (carbon and nitrogen) composition in the fire-determined forest/
non-forest mosaic of western Tasmania, Australia. We find no relationship between organic soil nitrogen and carbon content, despite widely varying local
vegetation and fire regimes. Pollen evidence supports the role of fire in driving an initial vegetation state change from forest to non-forest, while carbon
and nitrogen analysis of the peat section suggest that factors other than peat nutrient (carbon and nitrogen) content are responsible for the observed
meta-stability of non-forest at the site for 7000 years. We find that we cannot validate the use of organic soil nitrogen and carbon content for inferring
vegetation type and question the degree of post-European vegetation change inferred from this method.
en_US
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
ARC
DI110100019
Fondecyt
3110180
Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, Chile
Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica
3110180
Australian Research Council
DI110100019
IN140100050