Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorParedes Gil, Katherine 
Authordc.contributor.authorJaque, Pablo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T17:20:45Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-06-14T17:20:45Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationCatalysis Science and Technology Volumen: 6 Número: 3 Páginas: 755-766 (2016)en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1039/c5cy00826c
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/138817
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
General notedc.descriptionSin acceso a texto completo
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe differences between the first and second generation Grubbs catalysts have been the subject of much interest in olefin metathesis. In this direction, we revised in detail the dissociation reaction of 16e Grubbs precatalysts and the rotameric change between 14e inactive to active catalysts using a distortion/ interaction model (called here the reorganization energy Delta E-reorg and interaction energy Delta E-int) combined with DFT-based reactivity descriptors. We have found that there are no great changes between both generations in terms of the interaction energies and electronic descriptors; however, a lower reorganization energy for the conformational change in the second generation was shown to be significant, in agreement with the reverse trans effect proposed recently, confirming that structural effects play a key role in the reactivity of these Ru-based complexes. Furthermore, the difference of the Grubbs catalysts in the formation of the ruthenacyclobutane intermediate, RCB, shows that the biradical species needed to generate this type of compound is more easily formed by the second generation than by the first, with Delta Ereorg T-T (14) = -3.6 kcal mol(-1) vs. 11.8 kcal mol(-1), respectively. As a consequence, the different electronic features of the first and second generation Grubbs catalysts are manifested in the formation of ruthenacyclobutane intermediates, which allow us to propose that the higher catalytic activity of the second generation of Rubased complexes also has its origin in these effects and not only in structural changes. Finally, we have also found that the dielectric polarizability change was shown to be a suitable property to describe the intensity of polarization effects in the formation of ruthenacyclobutane as well as in the identification of productive and non-productive processes.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFONDECYT 1140340 1140503en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherRoyal Soc. Chemistryen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectDensity-fuctional theoryen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectHeterocyclic carbene ligandsen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectAB-initio pseudopotentialsen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectIMIDO Alkylidene complexesen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectOlefin-metathesisen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectNoncovalent interactionsen_US
Títulodc.titleTheoretical characterization of first and second generation Grubbs catalysts in styrene cross-metathesis reactions: insights from conceptual DFTen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record