Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorLuchsinger Farías, Vivian 
Authordc.contributor.authorPrades Pérez, Yara 
Authordc.contributor.authorRuiz, Mauricio 
Authordc.contributor.authorPizarro, Rolando 
Authordc.contributor.authorRossi, Patricio 
Authordc.contributor.authorLizama, Luis 
Authordc.contributor.authorGarmendia, María Luisa 
Authordc.contributor.authorMeza, Angela 
Authordc.contributor.authorLarrañaga Larrañaga, Carmen 
Authordc.contributor.authorAvendaño Carvajal, Luis 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-07-06T19:40:22Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-07-06T19:40:22Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Virology 88:1173–1179 (2016)en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI 10.1002/jmv.24463
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/139442
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the third cause of death worldwide. Viruses are frequently detected in adult CAP. Highly sensitive diagnostic techniques should be used due to poor viral shedding. Different sampling methods can affect viral detection, being necessary to establish the optimal type of sample for identifying respiratory viruses in adults. The detection rates of respiratory viruses by Luminex xTAG1 RVP fast assay, real time RT-PCR (rtRT-PCR) (Sacace1), and immunofluorescence assay (IFA) in adult CAP were performed in nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and aspirates (NPA) from 179 hospitalized adults. Positivity was 47.5% for Luminex1, 42.5% for rtRT-PCR (P¼0.3), and 2.7% for IFA (2.7%) (P<0.0). The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa coefficient of xTAG1 RVP compared with rtRT-PCR were 84.2%, 79.6%, and 0.62%, respectively. Luminex1 and rtRTPCR detected 65 (58.0%) and 57 (50.9%) viruses in 112 NPA and 35 (34.3%) and 31 (30.4%) in 102 NPS, respectively (P<0.01). xTAG1 RVP is appropriate for detecting respiratory viruses in CAP adults. Both molecular techniques yielded better results with nasopharyngeal aspirate than swabs.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog ıa (FONDECYT); Grant number: No.1121025en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectRespiratory virusesen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectLuminex xTAG RVPen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectPolymerase chain reactionen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectCommunityacquired pneumoniaen_US
Títulodc.titleComparison of Luminex xTAGW RVP Fast Assay and Real Time RT-PCR For the Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumoniaen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile